Generative AI and Academic Work Study
Mixed methods dissertation study tools, draft site
Dissertation Ecosystem Hub
Pedagogical Friction in the Age of Generative AI
This hub organizes the public and committee-facing materials for Micah J. Miner's qualitative-dominant convergent mixed methods study grounded in constructivist qualitative inquiry. Choose your path below.
Proposal defense passed August 13, 2026. Interview-question wording is being revised for committee review, followed by a planned three-educator rehearsal to assess conversational flow and an update to the IRB materials. IRB approval and formal study activity remain pending.
Select an entry point
The ecosystem is divided into public explanation, committee defense preparation, and practitioner-facing simulations.
Door 1: Public
Understand the Study
Read the proposal overview, explore the theoretical framework, and trace the intellectual history of pedagogical friction and tertiary algorithmicity.
Door 2: Committee
Inspect the Scholarship
Enter the preserved proposal defense studio. Review the claim-warrant ledger, trace the methods matrix, and explore the challenge deck used to prepare for the completed defense.
Door 3: Practitioners
Apply or Experience
Review the draft study instruments and simulations for university students, K-12 educators, and administrators. These pages are not open for dissertation data collection.
What to expect
The interview pages preview tools intended to support brief structured responses and longer reflections after committee and IRB review.
How responses are handled
- Responses remain in the browser until the participant downloads an export.
- Participants can download a JSON or Markdown file.
- Live interview recording with audio and video is optional, requires written permission, and uses the separate approved process.
- The public site does not capture video; only the student closing prompt includes optional browser-local audio.
- Exported files should be transferred only through the approved research process.
Participant choice
- Participation should follow the final consent process.
- Participants may skip any question.
- Participants can type and, on the student closing prompt only, optionally record browser-local audio when approved.
- There are no correct responses; the study is interested in lived experience and professional judgment.
Researcher review links
These links support review of the public research site and instruments. They are not required for participant completion.
researcher
Researcher overview
Review the role-specific pages, instrument links, and local-first workflow from one place.
public resources
Dissertation hub
Open the public dashboard of dissertation-related GitHub Pages resources and companion sites.
Post-defense instrument revision: This public site supports committee review, conversational-flow rehearsal, and dissertation planning. It must not be used for formal recruitment or main-study data collection until the protocol, consent language, data handling procedures, and IRB approval are finalized.