Researcher Overview

Pedagogical Friction Study Tools

Private-workflow guidance and quick links for reviewing the participant instruments and opening the analysis dashboard.

Safety Note

This page is public if someone has the URL. GitHub Pages does not provide authentication or role-based access. Use this overview for instrument review and navigation only. Do not place real participant exports, audio files, transcripts, identifiers, or coded data in this repository.

Researcher Review Links

These links are not shown on participant-facing pages. They are here for your review workflow.

Open dissertation sites dashboard Open methodology alignment studio Open analysis dashboard Open all-role instrument

Methodological Stance

For proposal and committee review, the study should be described as a qualitative-dominant convergent mixed methods design grounded in constructivist qualitative inquiry. Interviews and other open-ended evidence provide the qualitative core. Closed-ended survey items and national datasets provide supporting quantitative context. Adult university students are a participant group. AI-generated texts and agentic artifacts are analyzed as a distinct nonparticipant comparison source that retains at least one bounded, prespecified agentic-artifact task.

University Student

Blue identity. Focused on the pre-GenAI to post-GenAI learning transition.

Review student app

K-12 Classroom-Facing Educator

Green identity. Focused on classroom practice, productive struggle, and assessment.

Review teacher app

School / District Leader

Gold identity. Focused on policy implementation, instructional leadership, governance, and infrastructure across building and system levels.

Review leader app

Recommended Data Workflow

  1. Participant completes the appropriate role-specific instrument.
  2. Participant downloads a .json or .md export.
  3. Audio, if used, is downloaded separately and handled through the approved process.
  4. Exports are transferred through the IRB-approved secure workflow, not through this public site.
  5. You review or analyze files locally or in a protected research storage environment.

Cognitive Interview Note (Component 1): When using these tools to validate the survey, instruct the participant to 'think aloud' as they complete the quick items, reflection prompts, and card sort (whichever the instrument includes). Use the retrospective follow-up textboxes to record notes on comprehension difficulties, ambiguity in response options, or terminology problems.

What This Page Is For

Instrument review, quick navigation, and keeping the researcher workflow separate from participant-facing pages.

What This Page Is Not For

Authentication, private storage, participant upload, secure data collection, or hosting identifiable research records.