Understand the Study
Read the proposal overview, explore the theoretical framework, and trace the intellectual history of pedagogical friction and tertiary algorithmicity.
Dissertation Ecosystem Hub
Pedagogical Friction in the Age of Generative AI
This hub organizes the public and committee-facing materials for Micah J. Miner's qualitative-dominant convergent mixed methods study grounded in constructivist qualitative inquiry. Choose your path below.
Proposal defense passed August 13, 2026. The chair-approved 05A–05C interview questions are synchronized to the role-specific review pages. The separate working 05F card sort is synchronized for 05A and 05C but still requires chair and IRB review. IRB approval and formal study activity remain pending.
Select an entry point
The ecosystem is divided into public explanation, committee defense preparation, and practitioner-facing simulations.
Inspect the Scholarship
Enter the preserved proposal defense studio. Review the claim-warrant ledger, trace the methods matrix, and explore the challenge deck used to prepare for the completed defense.
Apply or Experience
Review the draft study instruments and simulations for university students, K-12 educators, and administrators. These pages are not open for dissertation data collection.
What to expect
The interview pages display the current question and card-sort wording for committee and IRB review. They do not accept participant responses.
Current review-only state
- Response entry, browser recording, local saving, and file export are disabled.
- The pages do not send participant information to GitHub Pages or another service.
- The shared ten-card 05F sort appears only on the 05A and 05C review pages.
- The 05B school/system-leader page contains no card sort.
- Any later activation must match the written IRB-approved protocol and data-management process.
Protocol boundaries
- No recruitment or participant activity begins before written IRB approval and other applicable permissions.
- The card sort is a separate optional activity for eligible 05A and 05C participants.
- Participants may skip any interview question or stop participation under the approved consent process.
- There are no correct responses; the study is interested in lived experience and professional judgment.
Researcher review links
These links support review of the public research site and instruments. They are not required for participant completion.
Researcher overview
Review the role-specific pages, instrument links, and local-first workflow from one place.
Dissertation hub
Open the public dashboard of dissertation-related GitHub Pages resources and companion sites.
Post-defense, pre-IRB review: This public site supports committee and IRB inspection only. It must not be used for recruitment, interviews, card sorting, validation, survey administration, or data collection until the applicable protocol, consent, data-handling procedures, permissions, and written IRB approval are finalized.