Designing with Friction: Protecting Durable Learning in the Age of Generative AI
Audience: educators, school leaders, and conference audiences.
Format: keynote or leadership session.
An evolving argument about education, technology, and human development, shared in classrooms, conference rooms, lecture halls, and public conversations.
Explore the speaking arcNext scheduled session
A working account of the AI tools used across the dissertation, and where the researcher's judgment has to stay in the loop.
Most recent conference session
June 11, 2026. What AI Makes Easy Might Be What Students Need to Struggle With, DuPage Regional Office of Education. View session
Audience pathways
Each presentation adapts a shared inquiry to the questions, stakes, and practices of its audience.
Signature speaking topics 2026
The public argument I am developing can be shaped as a keynote, workshop, leadership session, or scholarly conversation. These topics grow from current proposal work and public scholarship; they do not present dissertation findings.
Audience: educators, school leaders, and conference audiences.
Format: keynote or leadership session.
Audience: teachers, instructional coaches, and curriculum leaders.
Format: practical workshop.
Audience: superintendents, school boards, technology leaders, and cabinet teams.
Format: leadership workshop or board conversation.
Audience: social studies educators, curriculum leaders, and civic-learning organizations.
Format: curriculum workshop or conference session.
Interactive session tools
These public experiences move from hearing the framework to testing it. They are activities and companion tools, not additional presentations.
Carry one message through five media conditions and experience how each environment changes memory, authorship, and meaning.
Experience the media ecology journey →Practice distinguishing productive challenge from exclusionary barriers across realistic AI-supported learning cases.
Practice the design judgment →Work through the five technoskeptical questions, their Postman roots, and a pedagogical-friction overlay, with an applied stance for AI governance, curriculum, and equity.
Explore the technoskeptical stance →The speaking arc
From productive struggle to public purpose, the ideas and their stakes evolve.
The polished output may conceal the learning students did not have to do.
An interactive curriculum-studies exploration of resistance, formation, and agency.
A framework for noticing when generative fluency bypasses cognitive and noetic work.
Preserving historical inquiry through pedagogical friction in secondary social studies classrooms.
A fuller interactive version with resources, notes, and connected inquiry activities.
A practitioner-scholar workshop for diagnosing which forms of friction learning needs.
Instructional design strategies that preserve the struggle that develops learners.
A practical pathway from the framework to classroom decisions.
What happens to civic judgment when fluent answers arrive before inquiry?
What civic capacities disappear when speed and convenience become educational virtues?
The same argument, different rooms
The central concern remains human development. The language, evidence, and invitation change with the room.
Turns the framework into choices educators and leaders can make about tasks, tools, and institutional conditions.
See a conference session →Names the theory, tests the distinctions, and opens the conceptual framework to critique and further research.
See a scholarly session →Connects media conditions to judgment, public knowledge, democratic participation, and human formation.
See a civic adaptation →Connects instructional questions to governance, infrastructure, policy, and the conditions systems create.
See a leadership session →