Designing with Friction: Protecting Durable Learning in the Age of Generative AI
Audience: educators, school leaders, and conference audiences.
Format: keynote or leadership session.
An evolving argument about education, technology, and human development, shared in classrooms, conference rooms, lecture halls, and public conversations.
Next scheduled session
A district-leader keynote on screen time, pedagogical friction, and the decisions adults must retain when tools make schoolwork easier.
Most recent conference session
June 11, 2026. What AI Makes Easy Might Be What Students Need to Struggle With, DuPage Regional Office of Education. View session
Audience pathways
Each presentation adapts a shared inquiry to the questions, stakes, and practices of its audience.
Signature speaking topics 2026
The public argument I am developing can be shaped as a keynote, workshop, leadership session, or scholarly conversation. These topics grow from current proposal work and public scholarship; they do not present dissertation findings.
Audience: educators, school leaders, and conference audiences.
Format: keynote or leadership session.
Audience: teachers, instructional coaches, and curriculum leaders.
Format: practical workshop.
Audience: superintendents, school boards, technology leaders, and cabinet teams.
Format: leadership workshop or board conversation.
Audience: social studies educators, curriculum leaders, and civic-learning organizations.
Format: curriculum workshop or conference session.
Interactive session tools
These public experiences move from hearing the framework to testing it. They are activities and companion tools, not additional presentations.
Carry one message through five media conditions and experience how each environment changes memory, authorship, and meaning.
Experience the media ecology journey →Practice distinguishing productive challenge from exclusionary barriers across realistic AI-supported learning cases.
Practice the design judgment →Work through the five technoskeptical questions, their Postman roots, and a pedagogical-friction overlay, with an applied stance for AI governance, curriculum, and equity.
Explore the technoskeptical stance →Complete public directory
Conference sessions, keynotes, workshops, doctoral milestones, course presentations, and alternate editions are collected here.
Filters work together. Every result opens a public presentation in the same tab. Press Escape in the search field to clear the search.
Audit a draft device policy against Illinois Public Act 104-0657, which regulates personal phones and exempts school-issued devices by definition.
Apply a learning-goal lens to district tools and policies, then name one protection and one owner.
Weigh three implementation models against the device the statute leaves untouched, then test the frame against recording-capable glasses at dismissal.
Match research tools to scholarly tasks while retaining verification, authorship, privacy, and judgment.
The proposal argument, research questions, qualitative-dominant mixed-methods design, and study boundaries.
Records the proposal-defense milestone, committee feedback, IRB sequence, and next research gates.
An interactive reflection connecting educational leadership, doctoral research, and practitioner-scholar identity.
Tracks proposal-defense approval, CITI completion, IRB preparation, and proposal-to-IRB alignment.
Use the friction lens to distinguish support, bypass, and barriers in AI-supported learning.
Establishes the first monthly goals, proposal-stage boundaries, and planned dissertation milestones.
A practitioner-scholar workshop for diagnosing which forms of friction learning needs.
An interactive curriculum-studies exploration of resistance, formation, agency, and competing interpretations.
Distinguish visible performance from evidence of subsequent learning in AI-supported work.
Preserve sourcing, contextualization, corroboration, and accountable historical interpretation.
A fuller version with disciplinary examples, redesign activities, notes, and connected inquiry tools.
Instructional design strategies for preserving target thinking while reducing barriers.
A practical pathway from the conceptual framework to classroom task and support decisions.
Use four questions to protect civic reasoning, source work, and judgment in AI-supported lessons.
Ask what evidence shows that learners practiced the deliberation democratic life requires.
The fuller theoretical presentation, with learning-science lineages, media ecology, and an explicit proposed extension.
No presentations match these filters. Clear the filters or try a broader search.
The same argument, different rooms
The central concern remains human development. The language, evidence, and invitation change with the room.
Turns the framework into choices educators and leaders can make about tasks, tools, and institutional conditions.
See a conference session →Names the theory, tests the distinctions, and opens the conceptual framework to critique and further research.
See a scholarly session →Connects media conditions to judgment, public knowledge, democratic participation, and human formation.
See a civic adaptation →Connects instructional questions to governance, infrastructure, policy, and the conditions systems create.
See a leadership session →